When you buy through links on our site , we may realise an affiliate charge . Here ’s how it works .
Japan ’s nuclear governor has raised the menace level of a radioactive leak at the crippled Fukushima Daiichi works from 1 to 3 on a 7 - point in time musical scale .
Officials said Tuesday that a storage storage tank hasleaked 300 gobs of radioactive waterinto the solid ground . The rating upgrade , which has to be confirmed by the United Nations ' nuclear agency , would be the first since the March 2011 quake - induce reactor nuclear meltdown .
The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan.
Here are five things to know about the leak and related radiation :
1 . What does the atomic warning level entail ?
The International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale ( INES ) is a military rating arrangement for describing the hardness of nuclear accidents . It was stick in in 1990 by the International Atomic Energy Agency , which reports to the U.N.
The novel leakage is the first to be given an INES evaluation since the original cataclysm . Initially classified as a level one ( " Incident " ) , it has been upgrade to take down three ( " Serious Incident " ) , pending confirmation by the UN nuclear authority . A The acclivity to tear down 3 ( " Serious Incident " ) means the event involves the going of " a few thousand terabecquerels of body process into an sphere not have a bun in the oven by design which require corrective action , " or one resulting in radiation rates of " bang-up than one sievert per hour in an operating area , " according to the INES substance abuser ’s manual . A terabecquerel is 1 trillion becquerels , defined as the radioactive disintegration of one nucleus per second ; a sievert is a unit of biological radiotherapy dose combining weight to about 50,000 front sentiment chest X - rays .
2 . How much radioactive fabric leaked into the sea ?
Immediately after the June 2011 nuclear meltdown , scientists quantify that5,000 to 15,000 terabecquerelsof radioactive material was reaching the sea . The large scourge at that clock time was from the radionuclide cesium . But for leaks that enter the primer coat , the radionuclides strontium and tritium pose more of a threat , because cesium is absorb by the soil while the other two are not .
The Tokyo Electric Power Plant ( TEPCO ) gauge that since the March 2011 disaster , between 20 trillion and 40 trillion becquerels of radioactive tritium have leak into the ocean , the Nipponese newspaperAsahi Shimbunreported .
Thedamaged plantis still leak about 300 tons of water containing these radionuclides into the ocean every day , Japanese governance officials say . An extra 300 tons have leaked into the earth from the latest storage tank passing water .
3 . How will the radioactive material strike ocean life sentence ?
Ever since the 2011 calamity , scientist have been mensurate horizontal surface of radioactivity in fish and other ocean life . Several species of fish catch off the coast of Fukushima in 2011 and 2012 had atomic number 55 levels that outgo Japan ’s regulatory limit for seafood , but the overall caesium floor of sea life-time have dropped since the gloaming of 2011 , U.S. and Japanese scientist both account .
U.S. scientist say the groundwater leak could become worse , but warn against draw and quarter conclusions about the encroachment on sea life before match - reviewed study are discharge . " For Pisces that are harvested 100 mile [ 160 klick ] out to sea , I doubt it ’d be a job , " Nicholas Fisher , a marine biologist at Stony Brook University in Stony Brook , N.Y. , state LiveScience for aprevious article . " But in the region , yes , it ’s possible there could be sufficient contamination of local seafood , so it ’d be inexpedient to eat that seafood , " Fisher said.[7 Craziest Ways Japan ’s Earthquake Affected Earth ]
4 . What is being done to contain the outflow ?
industrial plant operators have started to transfer the polluted soil around the leak army tank , and are expect to remove any water remaining inside by the end of today ( Aug. 21),NBC Newsreported .
But operators are interested that other cooler may fail too . About a third of the storage tank , let in the one that just leaked , have synthetic rubber seams that TEPCO say were only meant to last about five years , The New York Timesreported . A TEPCO spokesperson said the company be after to work up additional watertight army tank with welded seams , but will still have to expend the ones with rubber seams .
pick up the radioactive water will take decades . Officials are considering several potential methods for preventing contaminated groundwater from reach the ocean , including block the basis around the plant or inject the circumvent deposit with a gel - like material that hardens like concrete . Ultimately , an integrate systematic water treatment design is need , Dale Klein , former head of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission enjoin LiveScience for a late article .
5 . How does Fukushima compare with the Chernobyl nuclear meltdown ?
The Fukushima plant ’s nuclear meltdown in 2011 is consider the worst atomic calamity sincethe Chernobyl meltdowninUkrainein 1986 . Although both were fall in an INES evaluation of 7 , far more radiation was released at Chernobyl — about 10 times as much as at Fukushima , NPR reported . And the health consequences a Fukushima to date have been much less severe .
The Chernobyl nuclear meltdown involved the explosion of an entire nuclear reactor that send out a plumage of radiation over a wide area . Many people nearby drank contaminated Milk River and later developed thyroid Cancer the Crab .
By contrast , Fukushima ’s radioactive core remained mostly protect , and much of the radioactive textile has been carried out to sea , far from human population . People in risky areas were evacuate , and contaminated intellectual nourishment was observe out of storage . While the recollective - term health risk are unknown , the World Health Organization said there is very little public wellness peril outside of the 18 - mile evacuation zone .
