By now you ’ve find out the news : people who eat drinking chocolate are thinner than those who do n’t . It ’s the perfect news program story , and one that a mass of outlets ran with — ourselves included — but it ’s also the variety of piece that science writerDeborah Blumsays can lead to public cynicism about science and what it does .
https://gizmodo.com/eating-chocolate-could-actually-help-you-lose-weight-5896567
This is a skillful news story .

And , no , sadly it ’s not that scientists have ultimately done that holy - grail field proving that deplete chocolate by the truckload induces weight exit . But a grouping from San Diegodid publish one this weekthat kind of , sort of propose that possible action .
And the good news is that , for the most part , journalists did not bite ( could n’t resist ) , at least not all . That is , while a slew of stories – - more than 600 - – sprang up just about everywhere , a estimable number remained skeptical about“The Willy Wonka Diet”as Wall Street Journal blogger Laura Kruetzer call it .
The survey was published as aresearch letterMonday in the Archives of Internal Medicine with the rather cautious title “ Association Between More Frequent Chocolate Consumption and Lower Body Mass Index . ” The press release from the University of California - San Diego , where lead writer Dr. Beatrice Golomb and her colleagues are based , took a more or less less conservative itinerary : Regular Chocolate Eaters are Thinner !

The imperativeness press release , in especial , turn up an irresistible quarry for aesculapian blogger Yoni Freedhoff , who promptlyposted a parody : Holy awesomesauce batman ! exhaust chocolate , get thinner ! If you ’re not use up it already , maybe you should ! Freedhoff was n’t impressed with the genuine study either .
His blog , by the way , is called Weighty Matters and he is a MD who specializes in weight unit personnel casualty treatments . So he took some meter to deconstruct what the survey itself really articulate - – and what it did n’t say .
As Freedhoff pointed out , the San Diego researchers were not originally studying umber but rather non - cardiac effects on statin drug . They enquire the 1017 sketch participants ( between the ages of 20 and 85 ; 70 percent male ) to fill out a life - style questionnaire regarding thing like diet choices and regular exercise . Participants were also weighed as part of the research and their body mass index ( BMI ) was record .

When Golomb and her colleagues analyzed the issue , they were surprised to find that participants who reported more frequent consumption of chocolate had low BMIs ( a measure of proportionate fat in the body ) than others in the subject . This pattern hold even when the hot chocolate - eaters did n’t cover additional high level of calorie - burning utilization activity .
In other words , the questionnaire revealed – - or at least seemed to reveal — a surprising association between self - reported confect consumption and BMI . Interesting , right ? And worth sharing . deserving tell the news medium – - as Golomb did - – that chocolate was her fresh favorite vegetable ? Let ’s call that debatable .
Because this was not , you note , a clinical or observational field of study designed to establish or find a mechanics for the influence of chocolate on weight . Health bloggers were middling irate about that , actually . And not just Freedhoff . “ Chocolate ca-ca you slim … like ergonomic chair make you fit , ” resume Blisstree blogger Briana Rognlin .

“ This study has some serious limitations , ” notedthe Happy Science blog , The Happy Scientist ( an anonymous doctorial student ) went on to list of them , including : 1 ) people lie about what they eat 2 ) the scientists “ guestimated ” actual calorie inlet from the questionnaire , making it difficult to judge the chocolate effect and that 3 ) the study is behind a paywall , so that many diary keeper were unable to estimate the existent data .
But , for the most part , even the mainstream media approached the termination warily .
“ It sounds a bit too good to be true,”began the tale by Jennifer Corbett Dooranof the Wall Street Journal , noting that the study did not actually prove a radio link between chocolate consumption and weight loss .

“ I take all these with a texture of salt since they ’re universe studies that make tie but do n’t prove a reason and effect,”wrote The Boston Globe ’s Deborah Kotz .
Ina well - researched story , Jacey Fortin , at the International Business Times , detailed the numerous questions that other researchers had raised about the study .
And at NPR ’s solid food web log , The Salt , Allison Aubrey wrote :

The researchers found that deep brown ’s correlation to thinness started to melt away among the participants who consumed the most . They also did n’t suss out whether the character of chocolate – white , Milk River , or iniquity , which can have varying amounts of hot chocolate – made a difference .
I ’d care to raise a modest business concern here that by over - hype a report like this , institutions may in the end be contributing to public cynicism about science and what it does . I ’m embolden by goodish skepticism in the science reportage residential area but I ’ll be more heartened when we see a comparable thoughtfulness at the distribution end as well .
To be fair , the UCSD scientists did not pretend that they ’d obtain an obesity cure in chocolate . And although they offer up up a possible account for their finding – - the roll in the hay anti - oxidant chemistry of the candy might also have a positive effect on metabolism - – they did not take to have try that either . Rather they intimate that it was an idea that needed further study .

In other password , stay tuned for the next round .
This stake byDeborah Blumoriginally appear onKnight Science Journalism Tracker , a blog dedicate to the valuation and improvement of skill writing across the country .
ChocolateHealthScience

Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , science , and polish intelligence in your inbox daily .
tidings from the future , delivered to your present tense .
You May Also Like






![]()
