Re : Your asking To Connect with Charlie Nadler on LinkedIn
First , an apology . Nearly five clientele days have passed since you sent your invitation , and I ’m just get back to you now . I do repent the check answer , but I take time to cerebrate this over as well as to craft a desirable riposte . I hope you understand .
Now then , for my answer : No , I will not join your professional mesh on LinkedIn .

There are several factors that led me to decline this invitation , but for our design , I will focalize on those which most heavy influenced my conclusion . To start with , I am simply not convinced that , at this point in our lives , we have any form of connection or affiliation which would make it appropriate for me to include myself in your professional net - or for that matter , in any other networks to which you might belong . If I recall correctly , the last time we were in physical contact was when we were both in the 7th class , at which item you and your family moved to another Ithiel Town . If we ever interact at all , I have no memories of it . I do recall that you had some problems with acne , and that you were one of the first in our class to see Jurassic Park - which bring you a brief moment of popularity , however momentary .
Consider : What if it turns out that you ’ve grown up to become one of these disagreeable citizenry who reek of raw sewage and openly play with themselves on the train ? Or perhaps you ’re the case who is constantly upgrade your visibility with added skill , specialty and joined groups ? These are precisely the form of confutable connections that can deflower a somebody ’s LinkedIn experience , and I ’m not prepared to take the risk .
Also , I notice something of a red fleur-de-lis when I analyze your invitation , and I feel it needs to be addressed . You and I are former acquaintances , if that . And yet , in your request , you signal that I am a “ protagonist . ” Are you such a sad , confused individual that you truly consider us to be friends ? Or , is this some kind of scheming attempt to mold a doubtful professional connection based on fraudulent call of friendly relationship ? If it ’s the latter , I can only imagine what variety of tainted , sordid ploy you had in mind when you attempted to lure me into this depraved connection . In any guinea pig , I want nothing to do with it .

I will acknowledge that I am curious as to what actuate you to adjoin me now , after all this clock time . So many year have passed ; if I were to fill up my eye , I doubt I ’d be able to picture your face . In fact , I ’ll try it mighty now , and sure enough …
Well this is interesting . Instead of your look , I ’m seeing what is likely grand of … yes these are definitely dead beast . My optic are open now but the image remains . I did n’t sleep with this many wolves even existed ! If they were n’t an endangered mintage before , they for certain are after whatever materialize here . The air is replete with the aroma of death and there ’s literally blood everywhere . Is any of this sounding familiar to you ?
That ’s unknown ; I just closed my eye again , and this time I was able to render your face immediately , with no dead wildcat or omnipresent blood or anything . False alarm I guess !

Anyway , give thanks you for the invitation , I suppose , but my resolution is going to be a firm no . Best of circumstances with everything , and please do not seek to contact me again .
Your “ protagonist , ”
Charlie

This clause by Charlie Nadler in the beginning appeared atThought Catalog . You should follow Thought Catalog on Twitterhere .
Daily Newsletter
Get the secure technical school , skill , and culture tidings in your inbox day by day .
News from the future , delivered to your present tense .
Please choose your desired newssheet and posit your e-mail to promote your inbox .

You May Also Like









![]()
